Skepticism and Interpretation Argues that Davidson's arguments against the possibility of massive error are unsuccessful, ultimately because it requires an overly strong reading of the requirement that meanings be publicly available.
Semantics for Opaque Contexts Criticizes Davidson's account of attitude contexts and offers a replacement which treats the relata of attitude reports as sentences rather than utterances.
Complex Demonstratives Paper with Lepore on the semantic form of complex demonstratives. The central proposal is that 'That F' has the form '[The x: x is F and x is that]'.
Vagueness and the Sorities Paradox On vagueness rather than Davidson, but background for the problem that vagueness presents for truth-theoretic semantics.
Davidson An overview of Davidson's life and philosophy.
De Re Necessities Deflationary semantics for modal statements with special attention to de re modal statements in a truth-theoretic framework. We won't be discussing this in the seminar.
Triangulation Triangulated Takes a critical look at the appeal to triangulation in Davidson's later work to solve the problem of finding an objective ground for the object of thought.
Truth and Meaning Redux: Reply to Soames A response to Soames's 2008 "Truth and Meaning: In Perspective" in which he argues Davidson's program has run its course.
Sententialism and Higher-order Attitude Attributions A response to the higher-order attitude objection to sententialism that charges that the propositionalist has the same problem and the same moves are open to both approaches.
Singular Thought and the Cartesian Theory of Mind Defends, inter alia, the view that 'I am hungry' as used by me expresses the same proposition as 'Ludwig is hungry' despite our resistance to substituting in certain attitude contexts.
Handout #4 The Impossibility of Radical Interpretation
Handout #5 Metaphysics and Epistemology: radically different conceptual schemes, impossibility of massive error, first person authority, inscrutability of reference.
Handout #6 Are There Any A Priori Arguments for Radical Interpretation?
Comments